![workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues](https://i1.wp.com/ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51OetkNTxKL.jpg)
- #WORKPLACE XT IMAGE VIEWER PRO RENDER IMAGE ISSUES UPGRADE#
- #WORKPLACE XT IMAGE VIEWER PRO RENDER IMAGE ISSUES PC#
- #WORKPLACE XT IMAGE VIEWER PRO RENDER IMAGE ISSUES PLUS#
It won't make the card run faster or even cooler, but it does protect the back of the PCB from potential damage - something I appreciate as I have accidentally killed at least one GPU in the past when a screw landed on the PCB while the PC was running and shorted out the card. About the only real 'extra' worth mentioning here is that XFX includes a metal backplate on the card. Cooling consists of two 95mm fans, arguably a lot more than the GPU requires for cooling purposes, but it should keep noise levels down. The card also weighs 594g, making it a relative lightweight. The card measures 237x130x39 mm, which isn't particularly large, but neither is it very compact. It's a decent step up from integrated graphics solutions, hopefully at a more affordable price than other GPUs, but we'll have to wait and see where it lands in the coming weeks.
![workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues](https://heartministrycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/HMC_Food_Pantry_Rendering.jpg)
If you like running multiple monitors, this definitely isn't an ideal card for such purposes. There's no RGB lighting, and it only includes two video ports: one HDMI 2.1 and one DisplayPort 1.4a. As you'd expect from a budget-oriented GPU, the card lacks extras. AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT at Amazon for $189.99 (opens in new tab)įor our launch review, AMD provided us with an XFX RX 6500 XT QICK 210.
![workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues](https://cdn-grid.fotosearch.com/CSP/CSP377/stop-bullying-clip-art__k30908531.jpg)
There are enough influencing factors that we really can't predict where the RX 6500 XT will land without putting it to the test. Notice that the GDDR6 memory comes clocked at 18Gbps, however, and the boost clock is 2815MHz - a record for reference specs on graphics cards. Except the PCIe interface is also just an x4 connection now, half of the Navi 23 and one-fourth of the normal x16 interface, and as mentioned already, video encoding and decoding support are more like what we saw with RX Vega than with even RDNA, never mind RDNA 2. Sure, Navi 24 got cut down to a puny 64-bit memory interface, but even a 16MB Infinity Cache will likely help effective memory bandwidth quite a bit. 6GB would have really helped in some of our tests at higher quality settings as well. It would have made the chip 5–10% larger and increased the memory cost, but even Nvidia - which has a reputation for being greedy - put 8GB on a card that nominally costs just $50 more. There was an easy middle ground that I wish AMD had used: 96-bit bus width and 6GB of VRAM. However, Nvidia's competing GTX 1650 Super has the same configuration but with a bus width that's twice as wide, and the upcoming RTX 3050 has a 128-bit bus width with 8GB of VRAM. Sure, this is a "budget" GPU, so you could make the argument that 4GB of VRAM is sufficient. Let's be frank for a moment: I think AMD went too far cutting down the features, particularly on the memory configuration.
![workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues workplace xt image viewer pro render image issues](https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/creative-coworking-office-interior-equipment-furniture-city-view-daylight-d-rendering-creative-coworking-office-interior-112895654.jpg)
Raw specs obviously don't tell the whole story, but certainly, a brand-new $199 GPU using TSMC's enhanced N6 process ought to be able to put some distance between itself and a $169 GPU using a 14nm process from nearly five years ago. More importantly, perhaps, are the official launch prices of $159 for the GTX 1650 Super (not shown in the above table) and $169 for the RX 570 4GB. We've included the RX 6600 and RX 570 in the above table as points of reference, the latter being a card that launched in April 2017. Can the resulting graphics card be worth the $200 asking price, never mind the more likely $300+ street prices we're likely to see? That's what we want to find out.
#WORKPLACE XT IMAGE VIEWER PRO RENDER IMAGE ISSUES PLUS#
It's basically half of the Navi 23 in most areas, plus AMD cut out some of the hardware video codec support for good (bad, actually) measure. The result is an incredibly tiny chip, measuring just 107mm^2, but still packing 5.4 billion transistors. AMD cut down the core features of the RDNA 2 architecture just about as far as it could go with Navi 24. It will likely end up selling at $300 or more, making this more of a mid-range offering in the traditional sense.īut let's forget about the price for a moment. We wish things were better, and we can hope that the RX 6500 XT will actually manage to land closer to its MSRP than other recent GPU launches… but don't be fooled by that $199 starting price.
#WORKPLACE XT IMAGE VIEWER PRO RENDER IMAGE ISSUES UPGRADE#
With GPU prices still hovering in the stratosphere and the shortages not set to ease until perhaps the end of 2022 (if we're lucky), the best graphics cards are continually overpriced and sold out, and everything in our GPU benchmarks hierarchy feels more like a theoretical upgrade rather than something you should actually consider buying. The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT represents the first real attempt at a modern "budget" GPU in over two years.